Matthews v. Williams et al (INMATE 1)

Filing 11

OPINION and ORDER that: 1. The Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge be and is hereby ADOPTED; 2. The plaintiff's claims against Ken Thompson and Stephanie Atchison and his challenge to a lack of transfer to the custody of the Alabama Departmen t of Corrections be and are hereby DISMISSED with prejudice in accordance with the directives of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(i); 3. The plaintiff's claims against John Williams and Rufus Haralson challenging the conditions of confinement in existence at the Lowndes County Jail be and are hereby REFERRED BACK to the Magistrate Judge for further proceedings. Signed by Honorable Judge Truman M. Hobbs on 11/2/2012. (jg, ) Modified on 11/2/2012 to clarify docket text (jg, ).

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA
NORTHERN DIVISION
MAURICE D. MATTHEWS, #251986,
Plaintiff,
v.
JOHN WILLIAMS, et al.,
Defendants.

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

CIV. ACT. NO. 2:12cv794-TMH
(WO)

OPINION and ORDER
On October 4, 2012, the Magistrate Judge filed a Recommendation in this case to
which no timely objections have been filed. (Doc. # 6). Upon an independent review of the
file in this case and upon consideration of the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, it
is
ORDERED and ADJUDGED as follows that:
1.

The Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge be and is hereby ADOPTED;

2.

The plaintiff’s claims against Ken Thompson and Stephanie Atchison and his

challenge to a lack of transfer to the custody of the Alabama Department of Corrections be
and are hereby DISMISSED with prejudice in accordance with the directives of 28 U.S.C.
§ 1915(e)(2)(B)(i);
3.

The plaintiff’s claims against John Williams and Rufus Haralson challenging

the conditions of confinement in existence at the Lowndes County Jail be and are hereby
REFERRED BACK to the Magistrate Judge for further proceedings.
Done this the 2nd day of November 2012.

/s/ Truman M. Hobbs
TRUMAN M. HOBBS
SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE