Clayton v. W. L. Petrey Wholesale Company, Inc.
ORDERED that Dft's 10 Amended Answer be STRICKEN from the record, as further set out in order. Signed by Honorable Judge Mark E. Fuller on 12/11/2012. (wcl, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA
W.L. PETREY WHOLESALE
CASE NO. 2:12-cv-838-MEF
(WO – Do Not Publish)
Defendant filed an Amended Answer (Doc. #10) with this Court on December 4,
2012. Defendant filed such amendment after the time period for amending a pleading as a
matter of course, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure Rule 15(a)(1), had expired.
Furthermore, Defendant neither obtained the opposing party’s written consent to the
amendment nor filed a motion seeking leave from this Court to amend its answer, pursuant
to Rule 15(a)(2). Because Defendant has failed to follow the Federal Rules of Civil
Procedure in its attempt to amend its answer, it is hereby ORDERED that Defendant’s
Amended Answer (Doc. #10) be STRICKEN from the record. Defendant may, however,
refile its amended answer pursuant to Rule 15(a)(2).
The Court also reminds Defendant that its amended answer, when properly filed,
must comply with Rule 15.1 of the Local Rules for the United States District Court for the
Middle District of Alabama for Civil and Criminal Cases, which provides in pertinent part
that “[a]ny amendment to a pleading . . . whether filed as a matter of course or upon a motion
to amend, must, except by leave of Court, reproduce the entire pleading . . . as amended, and
may not incorporate any prior pleading . . . by reference.” (emphasis added).
DONE this the 11th day of December, 2012.
/s/ Mark E. Fuller
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?