Griggs v. Thomas et al (INMATE 2)

Filing 12

ORDER that: 1. The plaintiff's objection 11 filed on November 5, 2012 to the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is overruled; 2. The Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge 8 filed on October 4, 2012 is adopted; 3. Plaintiff's com plaint against Defendants Thomas, Bentley, and Strange is DISMISSED without prejudice pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii); and 4. Plaintiff's complaint against Defendant Patterson, which challenges the alleged unc onstitutional conditions of confinement at the Holman Correctional Facility, is TRANSFERRED to the United States District Court for the Southern District of Alabama pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 1404(a) and 28 U.S.C. § 1631. Signed by Honorable Judge Truman M. Hobbs on 11/29/2012. (jg, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA NORTHERN DIVISION ARTHUR GRIGGS, #129969, Plaintiff, v. KIM TOBIAS THOMAS, et al., Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CASE NO. 2:12-cv-0843-TMH WO ORDER After an independent review of the file, it is the ORDER, JUDGMENT and DECREE of the court that: 1. The plaintiff's objection (Doc. #11) filed on November 5, 2012 to the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is overruled; 2. The Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (Doc. #8) filed on October 4, 2012 is adopted; 3. Plaintiff’s complaint against Defendants Thomas, Bentley, and Strange is DISMISSED without prejudice pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii); and 4. Plaintiff’s complaint against Defendant Patterson, which challenges the alleged unconstitutional conditions of confinement at the Holman Correctional Facility, is TRANSFERRED to the United States District Court for the Southern District of Alabama pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 1404(a) and 28 U.S.C. § 1631. DONE this the 29th day of November, 2012. /s/ Truman M. Hobbs TRUMAN M. HOBBS SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?