Hoglan v. Daniels et al (INMATE 2)
ORDER AND OPINION: It is ORDERED and ADJUDGED that the 29 Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge be and is hereby ADOPTED and that: 1. Defendants' 16 Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED; 2. Judgment is ENTERED in favor of defendants' 3. This case is DISMISSED with prejudice. Signed by Honorable Judge W. Harold Albritton, III on 10/26/2015. (dmn, )
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES
FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA
JAMES W. HOGLAN,
WARDEN LEPOSEY DANIELS, et al.,
CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:12cv864-WHA
ORDER AND OPINION
On October 1, 2015, the Magistrate Judge filed a Recommendation in this case to
which no timely objections have been filed. (Doc. # 29). Upon an independent review of
the file in this case and upon consideration of the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge,
ORDERED and ADJUDGED that the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge be
and is hereby ADOPTED and that:
Defendants’ motion for summary judgment (Doc. # 16) is GRANTED;
Judgment is ENTERED in favor of defendants;
This case is DISMISSED with prejudice.
Done this the 26th day of October, 2015.
/s/ W. Harold Albritton
SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?