Dorsey v. Glidewell Lawn Care Inc. et al (MAG+)

Filing 25

ORDER as follows: (1) Plaintiff's 24 Motion for Reconsideration is denied. (2) The magistrate judge's 23 Recommendation is adopted. (3) Defendants' 8 Motion to Dismiss is granted as to plaintiff's Title VII hostile-work-envi ronment claim and said claim is dismissed. (4) Defendants' 8 Motion to Dismiss is denied as to plaintiff's Title VII wrongful-termination claim and said claim shall proceed forward. (5) This matter is referred back to the magistrate judge for further appropriate proceedings. Signed by Honorable Judge Myron H. Thompson on 2/22/2013. (dmn, )

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE
MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, NORTHERN DIVISION

LEONARD E. DORSEY,
Plaintiff,
v.
GLIDEWELL LAWN CARE, INC.,
et al.,
Defendants.

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

CIVIL ACTION NO.
2:12cv884-MHT

ORDER
After an independent and de novo review of the record,
it is ORDERED as follows:
(1) Plaintiff’s motion for reconsideration (doc. no.
24) is denied.
(2) The magistrate judge’s recommendation (doc. no.
23) is adopted.
(3) Defendants’ motion to dismiss (doc. no. 8) is
granted as to plaintiff’s Title VII hostile-workenvironment claim and said claim is dismissed.

(4) Defendants’ motion to dismiss (doc. no. 8) is
denied

as

to

plaintiff’s

Title

VII

wrongful-

termination claim and said claim shall proceed
forward.
(5) This matter is referred back to the magistrate
judge for further appropriate proceedings.
DONE, this the 22nd day of February, 2013.

/s/ Myron H. Thompson
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE