Posey v. Giles et al (INMATE 1)

Filing 43

ORDER that the 42 Recommendation is ADOPTED, and it is hereby ORDERED as follows: 1) The Dfts' Motions for Summary Judgment are GRANTED; 2) Judgment will be entered in favor of the Dfts; 3) The case is DISMISSED with prejudice; 4) Costs are taxed against the Plf. Signed by Honorable Judge W. Harold Albritton, III on 2/22/2016. (wcl, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA NORTHERN DIVISION STEVE A. POSEY, #159154, ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Plaintiff, vs. J. C. GILES, et al., Defendants. CASE NO. 2:12cv-906-WHA (WO) ORDER This case is before the court on the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (Doc. #42), entered on January 28, 2016. There being no timely objection filed to the Recommendation, and after a review of the file, the Recommendation is ADOPTED, and it is hereby ORDERED as follows: 1. The Defendants’ Motions for Summary Judgment are GRANTED. 2. Judgment will be entered in favor of the Defendants. 3. The case is DISMISSED with prejudice. 4. Costs are taxed against the Plaintiff. DONE this 22nd day of February, 2016. /s/ W. Harold Albritton W. HAROLD ALBRITTON SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?