Kenner v. Hetzel et al (INMATE 2)

Filing 22

ORDER, JUDGMENT and DECREE of the court that: 1) The 16 Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is ADOPTED; 2) Plf's complaint against Dft Michael Johnson is DISMISSED with prejudice prior to service of process in accordance with the provisions of 28 USC §1915(e)(2)(B)(i); 3) Dft Michael Johnson is DISMISSED as a party to the Complaint; 4) This case with respect to the remaining dfts is referred back to the US Magistrate Judge for further proceedings. Signed by Honorable Judge Mark E. Fuller on 3/1/2013. (Attachments: # 1 Civil Appeals Checklist) (wcl, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA NORTHERN DIVISION BRADLEY KENNER, #231202, Plaintiff, v. GARY HETZEL, et al., Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CASE NO. 2:12-cv-938-MEF ORDER On January 30, 2013, the Magistrate Judge filed a Recommendation (Doc. #16) in this case to which no timely objections have been filed. Upon an independent review of the file in this case and upon consideration of the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, it is the ORDER, JUDGMENT and DECREE of the court that: 1. The Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is ADOPTED. 2. Plaintiff’s complaint against Defendant Michael Johnson is DISMISSED with prejudice prior to service of process in accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. §1915(e)(2)(B)(i). 3. Defendant Michael Johnson is DISMISSED as a party to the Complaint. 4. This case with respect to the remaining defendants is referred back to the United States Magistrate Judge for further proceedings. DONE this the 1st day of March, 2013. /s/ Mark E. Fuller UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?