Brand v. Hetzel et al (INMATE 2)

Filing 9

ORDER directing that: (1) The 5 Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is ADOPTED; (2) Plaintiff's 1 motion for preliminary injunction is DENIED; and (3) This case is REFERRED back to the Magistrate Judge for further proceedings on Plaintiff's claims. Signed by Chief Judge William Keith Watkins on 11/27/12. (scn, )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA
NORTHERN DIVISION
JAMESE EDWARD BRAND,
# 169195,
Plaintiff,
v.
GARY HETZEL, et al.,
Defendants.

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

CASE NO. 2:12-CV-940-WKW
[WO]

ORDER
On November 1, 2012, the Magistrate Judge filed a Recommendation (Doc. # 5)
regarding Plaintiff’s motion for preliminary injunction (Doc. # 1). No timely
objections have been filed. Based upon an independent and de novo review of the
record, it is ORDERED that
1.

The Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (Doc. # 5) is ADOPTED;

2.

Plaintiff’s motion for preliminary injunction (Doc. # 1) is DENIED; and

3.

This case is REFERRED back to the Magistrate Judge for further
proceedings on Plaintiff’s claims.

DONE this 27th day of November, 2012.

/s/ W. Keith Watkins
CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE