Brand v. Hetzel et al (INMATE 2)
ORDER directing that: (1) The 5 Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is ADOPTED; (2) Plaintiff's 1 motion for preliminary injunction is DENIED; and (3) This case is REFERRED back to the Magistrate Judge for further proceedings on Plaintiff's claims. Signed by Chief Judge William Keith Watkins on 11/27/12. (scn, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA
JAMESE EDWARD BRAND,
GARY HETZEL, et al.,
CASE NO. 2:12-CV-940-WKW
On November 1, 2012, the Magistrate Judge filed a Recommendation (Doc. # 5)
regarding Plaintiff’s motion for preliminary injunction (Doc. # 1). No timely
objections have been filed. Based upon an independent and de novo review of the
record, it is ORDERED that
The Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (Doc. # 5) is ADOPTED;
Plaintiff’s motion for preliminary injunction (Doc. # 1) is DENIED; and
This case is REFERRED back to the Magistrate Judge for further
proceedings on Plaintiff’s claims.
DONE this 27th day of November, 2012.
/s/ W. Keith Watkins
CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?