Collins v. Thomas et al (INMATE 1)

Filing 42

ORDERED as follows: 1) Plf's 40 Objection is OVERRULED, and the 36 Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is ADOPTED; 2) The Dfts' 20 Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED, and this case is DISMISSED with prejudice. Signed by Honorable Judge W. Harold Albritton, III on 8/31/2015. (wcl, )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FORTHE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA
NORTHERN DIVISION

JACKIE COLLINS, #129737,

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

Plaintiff,
vs.
KIM THOMAS, et al.,
Defendants.

CASE NO. 2:12-cv-950-WHA

ORDER
This case is before the court on the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (Doc. #36),
entered on July 6, 2015, and the Plaintiff’s Objection thereto (Doc. #40).
The court has conducted an independent evaluation and de novo review of the file in this
case, and, having done so, the court finds the objection to be without merit. In his objection, the
Plaintiff merely repeats his arguments and claims for relief which were thoroughly addressed in
the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge. This court agrees with the well-reasoned
Recommendation, and it is hereby ORDERED as follows:
1. Plaintiff’s Objection is OVERRULED, and the Recommendation of the Magistrate
Judge is ADOPTED.
2. The Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED, and this case is
DISMISSED with prejudice.
DONE this 31st day of August, 2015.

/s/ W. Harold Albritton
W. HAROLD ALBRITTON
SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE