Pickett v. Montgomery County Jail et al (INMATE 1)
Filing
7
OPINION and ORDER (1) ADOPTING 5 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION of the Mag Judge; (2) the claims against defendants the Montgomery County Jail and the Montgomery County Nurse Station be and are hereby DISMISSED pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. 1 915(e)(2)(B)(i) as these defendants are not legal entities subject to suit; (3) This case be and is hereby DISMISSED with prejudice prior to service of process pursuant to the directives of 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2)(B)(i) as the plaintiff failed to file the complaint within the time prescribed by the applicable period of limitation. Signed by Honorable Judge Truman M. Hobbs on 1/22/13. (djy, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA
NORTHERN DIVISION
EDWARD CHARLES PICKETT,
AIS # 182000,
Plaintiff,
v.
MONTGOMERY COUNTY JAIL, et al.,
Defendants.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
CIV. ACT. NO. 2:12cv986-TMH
(WO)
OPINION and ORDER
On December 12, 2012, the Magistrate Judge filed a Recommendation in this case to
which no timely objections have been filed. (Doc. # 5). Upon an independent review of the
file in this case and upon consideration of the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, it
is
ORDERED and ADJUDGED as follows that:
1.
The Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge be and is hereby ADOPTED;
2.
The claims against Defendants the Montgomery County Jail and the
Montgomery County Nurse Station be and are hereby DISMISSED pursuant to the provisions
of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(i) as these defendants are not legal entities subject to suit;
3.
This case be and is hereby DISMISSED with prejudice prior to service of
process pursuant to the directives of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(i) as the plaintiff failed to file
the complaint within the time prescribed by the applicable period of limitation.
Done this the 22nd day of January, 2013.
/s Truman M. Hobbs
TRUMAN M. HOBBS
SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?