Mallory v. Hetzel et al (INMATE 2)
Filing
44
OPINION and ORDER: it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED that the Recommendation of the magistrate Judge be and is hereby ADOPTED, and this case be and is hereby DISMISSED as follows: 1. Plaintiff's request for injunctive relief (Doc. 1 ) is DENIED as moo t; 2. Plaintiff's third affidavit (Doc. 19 ) is STRICKEN as a sham affidavit; 3. Defendants' motion for summary judgment (Doc. 14 ) is GRANTED. Final Judgment will be entered in favor of Defendants. Signed by Honorable Judge W. Harold Albritton, III on 9/19/2016. (kh, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA
NORTHERN DIVISION
JACQUES MALLORY, # 191 525,
Plaintiff,
v.
WARDEN GARY HETZEL, III, et al.,
Defendants.
)
)
)
)
) CIVIL ACTION NO.: 2:12-CV-1011-WHA
)
[WO]
)
)
)
OPINION and ORDER
On August 26, 2016, the Magistrate Judge filed a Recommendation in this case to which
no timely objections have been filed. Doc. 43. Upon an independent review of the file in this case
and upon consideration of the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, it is
ORDERED and ADJUDGED that the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge be and is
hereby ADOPTED, and this case be and is hereby DISMISSED as follows:
1. Plaintiff’s request for injunctive relief (Doc. 1) is DENIED as moot;
2. Plaintiff’s third affidavit (Doc. 19) is STRICKEN as a sham affidavit;
3. Defendants’ motion for summary judgment (Doc. 14) is GRANTED.
Final Judgment will be entered in favor of Defendants.
Done, this 19th day of September, 2016.
/s/ W. Harold Albritton
SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?