Daniels v. United States of America (INMATE 3)

Filing 13

ORDER and OPINION that it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED that the 12 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION of the Magistrate Judge be and is hereby ADOPTED, the 28 USC 2255 motion is DENIED because it was not filed within the one-year limitation period in 28 USC 2255(f), and this case is DISMISSED with prejudice. Signed by Honorable Judge W. Harold Albritton, III on 2/3/15. (djy, )

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES
FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA
NORTHERN DIVISION
ROBERT SHAROND DANIELS,
Petitioner,
v.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Respondent.

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:12cv1015-WHA

ORDER AND OPINION
On January 8, 2015, the Magistrate Judge filed a Recommendation in this case to
which no timely objections have been filed. (Doc. # 12). Upon an independent review of
the file in this case and upon consideration of the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge,
it is
ORDERED and ADJUDGED that the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge be
and is hereby ADOPTED, the 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion is DENIED because it was not filed
within the one-year limitation period in 28 U.S.C. § 2255(f), and this case is DISMISSED
with prejudice.
Done this the 3rd day of February, 2015.

/s/ W. Harold Albritton
SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE