Boyd v. Folks et al (INMATE 1)

Filing 5

ORDER that the 4 Recommendation be and is hereby ADOPTED and the petitionfor habeas corpus relief pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 be and is hereby DENIED and this case be and is hereby DISMISSED in accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C.  7; 2244(b)(3)(A) as the petitioner has failed to obtain the requisite order from the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals authorizing this court to consider a successive habeas application. Signed by Honorable Judge Truman M. Hobbs on 1/22/2013. (dmn, )

Download PDF
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA NORTHERN DIVISION COURTNEY BOYD, # 208921, Petitioner, v. SYLVESTER FOLKS, et al., Respondents. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Civil Action No. 2:12cv1022-TMH ORDER On December 14, 2012, the Magistrate Judge filed a Recommendation in this case to which no timely objections have been filed. Upon an independent review of the file in this case and upon consideration of the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, it is ORDERED that the Recommendation be and is hereby ADOPTED and the petition for habeas corpus relief pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 be and is hereby DENIED and this case be and is hereby DISMISSED in accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 2244(b)(3)(A) as the petitioner has failed to obtain the requisite order from the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals authorizing this court to consider a successive habeas application. Done this the 22nd day of January, 2013. /s/ Truman M. Hobbs TRUMAN M. HOBBS SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?