Boyd v. Folks et al (INMATE 1)

Filing 5

ORDER that the 4 Recommendation be and is hereby ADOPTED and the petitionfor habeas corpus relief pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 be and is hereby DENIED and this case be and is hereby DISMISSED in accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C.  7; 2244(b)(3)(A) as the petitioner has failed to obtain the requisite order from the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals authorizing this court to consider a successive habeas application. Signed by Honorable Judge Truman M. Hobbs on 1/22/2013. (dmn, )

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES
FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA
NORTHERN DIVISION
COURTNEY BOYD, # 208921,
Petitioner,
v.
SYLVESTER FOLKS, et al.,
Respondents.

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

Civil Action No. 2:12cv1022-TMH

ORDER
On December 14, 2012, the Magistrate Judge filed a Recommendation in this case to
which no timely objections have been filed. Upon an independent review of the file in this
case and upon consideration of the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, it is
ORDERED that the Recommendation be and is hereby ADOPTED and the petition
for habeas corpus relief pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 be and is hereby DENIED and this case
be and is hereby DISMISSED in accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. §
2244(b)(3)(A) as the petitioner has failed to obtain the requisite order from the Eleventh
Circuit Court of Appeals authorizing this court to consider a successive habeas application.
Done this the 22nd day of January, 2013.

/s/ Truman M. Hobbs
TRUMAN M. HOBBS
SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE