Sweeney v. Daniels, et al (INMATE 1)

Filing 19

ORDER directing that, after an independent review of the file, it is the ORDER, JUDGMENT and DECREE of the court that: (1) The petitioner's objection (Doc. # 18 ) to the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge filed on January 7, 2014 is overrule d; (2) The Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (Doc. # 17 ) filed on December 20, 2013 is adopted; (3) The petition for habeas corpus relief is DENIED and that this case is DISMISSED pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2244(d); (4) The costs of this proceeding are taxed against the petitioner. Signed by Honorable Judge Mark E. Fuller on 5/16/14. (scn, )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA
NORTHERN DIVISION
DWIGHT DARNELL SWEENEY, 187597, )
)
Petitioner,
)
v.
)
)
LEEPOSEY DANIELS, et al.,
)
)
Respondents.
)

CASE NO. 2:12-cv-1039-TMH
WO

ORDER
After an independent review of the file, it is the ORDER, JUDGMENT and DECREE
of the court that:
1. The petitioner's objection (Doc. #18) to the Recommendation of the Magistrate
Judge filed on January 7, 2014 is overruled;
2. The Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (Doc. #17) filed on December 20,
2013 is adopted;
3. The petition for habeas corpus relief is DENIED and that this case is DISMISSED
pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2244(d).
4. The costs of this proceeding are taxed against the petitioner.
DONE this the 16th day of May, 2014.

/s/ Mark E. Fuller
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE