Purnell v. State of Alabama (INMATE 2)
Filing
6
OPINION and ORDER: it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED as follows that: 1) The 4 Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge be and is hereby ADOPTED; 2) The plf's § 1983 claims be and are hereby DISMISSED with prejudice prior to service of process und er 28 USC § 1915(e)(2)(B)(i) and (iii); 3) The plf's challenge to the constitutionality of his conviction and/or sentence under which he is currently incarcerated be and is hereby DISMISSED without prejudice pursuant to the provisions of 28 USC § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii) as such claims are not properly before the court at this time; and 4) This case be and is hereby DISMISSED prior to service of process. Signed by Honorable Judge Truman M. Hobbs on 1/30/2013. (wcl, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA
NORTHERN DIVISION
ADRIAN PURNELL, #228442,
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Plaintiff,
v.
STATE OF ALABAMA,
Defendant.
CIV. ACT. NO. 2:12cv1045-TMH
(WO)
OPINION and ORDER
On December 18, 2012, the Magistrate Judge filed a Recommendation in this case to
which no timely objections have been filed. (Doc. # 4). Upon an independent review of the
file in this case and upon consideration of the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, it
is
ORDERED and ADJUDGED as follows that:
1.
The Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge be and is hereby ADOPTED;
2.
The plaintiff’s § 1983 claims be and are hereby DISMISSED with prejudice
prior to service of process under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(i) and (iii);
3.
The plaintiff’s challenge to the constitutionality of his conviction and/or
sentence under which he is currently incarcerated be and is hereby DISMISSED without
prejudice pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii) as such claims are not
properly before the court at this time; and
4.
This case be and is hereby DISMISSED prior to service of process.
Done this the 30th day of January, 2013
/s/ Truman M. Hobbs
TRUMAN M. HOBBS
SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?