Gaston v. Daniels et al (INMATE 1)

Filing 11

ORDER directing that, after a review of the 10 Recommendation, and after an independent review of the entire record, the court finds that the Recommendation should be adopted. Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is hereby ADOPTED and this case is DISMISSED without prejudice for failure of Plaintiff to file a response to the June 19, 2014 show cause order. Signed by Honorable Judge W. Harold Albritton, III on 7/31/14. (scn, )

Download PDF
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA NORTHERN DIVISION ANDREW GASTON, #260494, ) ) ) ) ) CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:12-cv-1120-TMH ) ) ) ) ) Plaintiff, v. RANDY DANIELS, et al., Defendants. ORDER The Magistrate Judge entered a Recommendation (Doc. 10) in this case to which no timely objections have been filed. After a review of the Recommendation, and after an independent review of the entire record, the court finds that the Recommendation should be adopted. Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is hereby ADOPTED and this case is DISMISSED without prejudice for failure of Plaintiff to file a response to the June 19, 2014 show cause order. A separate judgment shall issue. Done this 31st day of July, 2014. /s/ W. Harold Albritton SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?