Metcalf v. Hetzel et al (INMATE 1)

Filing 23

ORDERED that the 22 Recommendation is ADOPTED, and it is hereby ORDERED as follows: 1. The Defendants' 18 Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED. 2. Judgment is GRANTED in favor of the Defendants. 3. This case is DISMISSED with prejudice. 4. Costs are taxed against the Plaintiff. Signed by Honorable Judge W. Harold Albritton, III on 12/1/2015. (kh, )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA
NORTHERN DIVISION

DANIEL RAY METCALF, #268903,

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

Plaintiff,
vs.
GARY HETZEL, et al.,
Defendants.

CASE NO. 2:13cv-002-WHA
(WO)

ORDER
This case is before the court on the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (Doc. #22),
entered on October 22, 2015. There being no timely objection filed to the Recommendation, and
after a review of the file, the Recommendation is ADOPTED, and it is hereby ORDERED as
follows:
1. The Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED.
2. Judgment is GRANTED in favor of the Defendants.
3. This case is DISMISSED with prejudice.
4. Costs are taxed against the Plaintiff.
DONE this 1st day of December, 2015.

/s/ W. Harold Albritton
W. HAROLD ALBRITTON
SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE