Boissonneau v. United States of America ( INMATE 3)
Filing
5
OPINION. Signed by Honorable Judge Myron H. Thompson on 1/8/13. (scn, )
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE
MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, NORTHERN DIVISION
SEAN MICHAEL BOISSONNEAU,
Petitioner,
v.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Respondent.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
CIVIL ACTION NO.
2:13cv020-MHT
(WO)
OPINION
The matter is before the court on petitioner Sean
Michael Boissonneau’s pro se motions for a concurrent
sentence
treating,
(Doc.
Nos.
first,
2
and
3),
as
a
motion
which
pursuant
the
to
court
28
is
U.S.C.
§ 2255, and, second, as seeking habeas corpus relief on
grounds of ineffective assistance of counsel.
agree such relief is proper.
Both sides
The court will therefore
grant Boissoneau’s petition for habeas corpus relief as
follows:
(1)
The
judgment
in
United
States
v.
Boissonneau, criminal action number 2:10cr176-MHT (Doc.
No. 38) (M.D. Ala.), is amended to reflect that the
sentence is concurrent with the sentence issued in the
Montgomery
County,
Alabama,
Circuit
Court,
Case
No.
CC-08-648; and (2) this amendment is nunc pro tunc,
meaning that the amendment is effective as of the date of
the original judgment in the criminal case.
An appropriate judgment will be entered.
DONE, this the 8th day of January, 2013.
/s/ Myron H. Thompson
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?