Moore v. Rowells et al (INMATE 2)
Filing
5
OPINION and ORDER: It is ORDERED and ADJUDGED that the 4 Recommendation of the Magistrate Judgebe and is hereby ADOPTED, and that the Complaint be and hereby is DISMISSED prior to service of process, and that the § 1983 claims in this case be and are hereby DISMISSED with prejudice pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915 (e)(2)(B)(i) and that the state law claims in this case be and are hereby DISMISSED without prejudice. Signed by Honorable Judge Truman M. Hobbs on 2/26/2013. (dmn, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA
NORTHERN DIVISION
CHARLES E. MOORE, #180 583,
Plaintiff,
v.
WILLIE ROWELL, et al,
Defendants.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
CASE NO. 2:13-cv-34-TMH
[wo]
OPINION and ORDER
On January 30, 2013, the Magistrate Judge filed a Recommendation in this case
dismissing this case prior to service of process pursuant to the directives of 28 U.S.C.§
1915(e)(2)(B)(i), to which no timely objections have been filed. (Doc. No. 4). Upon an
independent review of the file in this case and upon consideration of the
Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, it is
ORDERED and ADJUDGED that the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge
be and is hereby ADOPTED, and that the Complaint be and hereby is DISMISSED prior
to service of process, and that the § 1983 claims in this case be and are hereby
DISMISSED with prejudice pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915 (e)(2)(B)(i) and that the state
law claims in this case be and are hereby DISMISSED without prejudice..
Done this the 26th day of February, 2013.
/s/ Truman M. Hobbs
TRUMAN M. HOBBS
SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?