Elmore v. United States of America (INMATE 3)

Filing 19

ORDERED as follows: 1) The 17 "Motion to Hold in Abeyance" is DENIED; 2) The 17 "Motion for Extension of Time" is GRANTED; 3) The petitioner is GRANTED an extension from 5/21/2013, to and including 7/5/2013, to file a reply to the response filed by the Government in compliance with this court's orders; 4) In the interest of judicial economy, the Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to send the petitioner a copy of the Government's 13 Response with all exhibits attached thereto. Signed by Honorable Judge Charles S. Coody on 6/13/2013. (wcl, )

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES
FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA
NORTHERN DIVISION
MARSHA DIANE ELMORE,
Petitioner,
v.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Respondent.

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

Civil Action No. 2:13cv44-MEF

ORDER ON MOTION
Upon consideration of the petitioner’s “Motion to Hold in Abeyance and Motion for
Extension of Time to File a Response to the Government’s Opposition of Petitioner’s 28
U.S.C. § 2255” (Doc. No. 17), it is ORDERED as follows:
1. The “Motion to Hold in Abeyance” is DENIED.
2. The “Motion for Extension of Time” is GRANTED.
3. The petitioner is GRANTED an extension from May 21, 2013, to and including
July 5, 2013, to file a reply to the response filed by the Government in compliance with this
court’s orders.
4. In the interest of judicial economy, the Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to send the
petitioner a copy of the Government’s response (Doc. No. 13) with all exhibits attached
thereto.
Done this 13th day of June, 2013.

/s/ Charles S. Coody
CHARLES S. COODY
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE