Goff v. State Military Department, et al (MAG+)

Filing 45

ORDER: (1) Plaintiff Shannon Goff's objections 41 and 44 are overruled. (2) The magistrate judge's recommendation 40 is adopted. (3) Defendants Walter Burke, Toni Middleton, Connie Newman, and Mark Weeks's motions to dismiss [9 ] and 32 are granted. (4) Defendants Burke, Middleton, Newman, and Weeks and the claim against them are dismissed. This case is referred back to the magistrate judge for further appropriate proceedings. Signed by Honorable Judge Myron H. Thompson on 9/24/2013. (jg, )

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE
MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, NORTHERN DIVISION

SHANNON GOFF,
Plaintiff,
v.
STATE MILITARY DEPARTMENT,
et al.,
Defendants.

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

CIVIL ACTION NO.
2:13cv60-MHT

ORDER
After an independent and de novo review of the record,
it is the ORDER, JUDGMENT, and DECREE of court as follows:
(1) Plaintiff Shannon Goff’s objections (doc. nos. 41
and 44) are overruled.
(2) The magistrate judge’s recommendation (doc. no.
40) is adopted.
(3) Defendants Walter Burke, Toni Middleton, Connie
Newman, and Mark Weeks’s motions to dismiss (doc. nos. 9
and 32) are granted.

(4) Defendants Burke, Middleton, Newman, and Weeks and the
claim against them are dismissed.
This case is referred back to the magistrate judge for
further appropriate proceedings.
DONE, this the 24th day of September, 2013.

/s/ Myron H. Thompson
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE