J.J.A.W. v. Strange (MAG+)
ORDER GRANTING 7 MOTION for Extension of time; further ORDERING that the parties may file Objections to R&R on or before 5/16/2013, as further set out in order. Signed by Honorable Judge Charles S. Coody on 4/22/13. (djy, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA
by and through his next friend,
Marla A. Williams,
Luther Strange, Attorney General,
CIVIL ACT. NO. 2:13cv157-MHT
Now pending before the court is the motion for extension of time filed by Marla A.
Williams. (Doc. 7). Having considered the motion, and for good cause, it is
ORDERED that the motion for extension of time (Doc. 7) be and is hereby
GRANTED. Further, it is
ORDERED that on or before May 16, 2013, the parties may file objections to the
Magistrate Judge’s Recommendation (Doc. 6). Any objections filed must specifically
identify the findings in the Magistrate Judge’s Recommendation to which the party is
objecting. Frivolous, conclusive or general objections will not be considered by the District
Court. The Magistrate Judge’s Recommendation is not a final order of the court and,
therefore, it is not appealable.
Failure to file written objections to the proposed findings and advisements in the
Magistrate Judge’s Recommendation shall bar the party from a de novo determination by the
District Court of issues covered in the Recommendation and shall bar the party from
attacking on appeal factual findings in the Recommendation accepted or adopted by the
District Court except upon grounds of plain error or manifest injustice.
Wainwright, 677 F.2d 404 (5th Cir. 1982); see Stein v. Reynolds Securities, Inc., 667 F.2d
33 (11th Cir. 1982); see also Bonner v. City of Prichard, 661 F.2d 1206 (11th Cir. 1981, en
banc) (adopting as binding precedent all of the decisions of the former Fifth Circuit handed
down prior to the close of business on September 30, 1981).
Done this 22nd day of April, 2013.
/s/Charles S. Coody
CHARLES S. COODY
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?