Long v. Alabama Department of Human Resources et al(JOINT ASSIGN)(MAG+)

Filing 74

JUDGMENT: It is the ORDER, JUDGMENT, and DECREE of the court as follows: (1) Plaintiff's 55 Objections are overruled. (2) The United States Magistrate Judge's 54 Recommendation, as to the conclusions but not as to all of the reasoning, is adopted to all of plaintiff's claims except his state-law claim. (3) Plaintiff's 25 Motion for Summary Judgment is denied. (4) Defendants 27 Motion for Summary Judgment is granted as to all of plaintiff's claims except his state -law claim. (5) Judgment is entered in favor of defendants and against plaintiff on all his claims except his state-law claim, with plaintiff taking nothing by his complaint except as to his state-law claim. (6) Plaintiff's state-law claim is di smissed without prejudice and with leave to refile in state court. It is further ORDERED that all other outstanding motions are denied as moot. It is further ORDERED that costs are taxed against plaintiff, for which execution may issue. The clerk of the court is DIRECTED to enter this document on the civil docket as a final judgment pursuant to Rule 58 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. This case is closed. Signed by Honorable Judge Myron H. Thompson on 1/30/2015. Copies furnished to calendar group, AG. (Attachments: # 1 Civil Appeals Checklist) (dmn, ) (Deadline terminated: Jury Trial set for 2/23/2015.) Modified on 1/30/2015 to include terminated deadline text. (dmn, )

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE
MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, NORTHERN DIVISION
JAMES LONG,

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

Plaintiff,
v.
ALABAMA DEPARTMENT OF
HUMAN RESOURCES, et al.,
Defendants.

CIVIL ACTION NO.
2:13cv176-MHT
(WO)

JUDGMENT
In accordance with the memorandum opinion entered on
this date, it is the ORDER, JUDGMENT, and DECREE of the
court as follows:
(1) Plaintiff's

objections

(doc.

no.

55)

are

overruled.
(2) The

United

States

Magistrate

Judge's

recommendation (doc. no. 54), as to the conclusions but
not as to all of the reasoning, is adopted as to all of
plaintiff’s claims except his state-law claim.
(3) Plaintiff’s
no. 25) is denied.

motion

for

summary

judgment

(doc.

(4) Defendants’

motion

for

summary

judgment

(doc.

no. 27) is granted as to all of plaintiff’s claims except
his state-law claim.
(5) Judgment is entered in favor of defendants and
against plaintiff on all his claims except his state-law
claim, with plaintiff taking nothing by his complaint
except as to his state-law claim.
(6) Plaintiff’s state-law claim is dismissed without
prejudice and with leave to refile in state court.
It

is

further

ORDERED

that

all

other

outstanding

motions are denied as moot.
It is further ORDERED that costs are taxed against
plaintiff, for which execution may issue.
The clerk of the court is DIRECTED to enter this
document on the civil docket as a final judgment pursuant
to Rule 58 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.
This case is closed.
DONE, this the 30th day of January, 2015.
/s/ Myron H. Thompson___
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE