Radford v. Thomas et al (INMATE 1)

Filing 100

ORDER directing that, after an independent review of the file, it is the ORDER, JUDGMENT and DECREE of the court that: (1) The plaintiff's 93 objection to the 70 Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is overruled; (2) The 70 Recommendatio n of the Magistrate Judge is adopted; (3) The 51 motion for preliminary injunction filed by the plaintiff on July 25, 2013 is DENIED; (4) This case is referred back to the Magistrate Judge for additional proceedings. Signed by Honorable Judge Mark E. Fuller on 9/20/13. (scn, )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA
NORTHERN DIVISION
THOMAS RADFORD, #156846,
Plaintiff,
v.
KIM TOBIAS THOMAS, et al.,
Defendants.

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

CASE NO. 2:13-cv-188-MEF
WO

ORDER
After an independent review of the file, it is the ORDER, JUDGMENT and DECREE
of the court that:
1. The plaintiff's objection (Doc. #93) to the Recommendation of the Magistrate
Judge filed on September 11, 2013 is overruled;
2. The Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (Doc. #70) entered on August 19,
2013 is adopted;
3. The motion for preliminary injunction filed by the plaintiff on July 25, 2013 is
DENIED.
4. This case is referred back to the Magistrate Judge for additional proceedings.
DONE this the 20th day of September, 2013.

/s/ Mark E. Fuller
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE