Radford v. Thomas et al (INMATE 1)

Filing 100

ORDER directing that, after an independent review of the file, it is the ORDER, JUDGMENT and DECREE of the court that: (1) The plaintiff's 93 objection to the 70 Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is overruled; (2) The 70 Recommendatio n of the Magistrate Judge is adopted; (3) The 51 motion for preliminary injunction filed by the plaintiff on July 25, 2013 is DENIED; (4) This case is referred back to the Magistrate Judge for additional proceedings. Signed by Honorable Judge Mark E. Fuller on 9/20/13. (scn, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA NORTHERN DIVISION THOMAS RADFORD, #156846, Plaintiff, v. KIM TOBIAS THOMAS, et al., Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CASE NO. 2:13-cv-188-MEF WO ORDER After an independent review of the file, it is the ORDER, JUDGMENT and DECREE of the court that: 1. The plaintiff's objection (Doc. #93) to the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge filed on September 11, 2013 is overruled; 2. The Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (Doc. #70) entered on August 19, 2013 is adopted; 3. The motion for preliminary injunction filed by the plaintiff on July 25, 2013 is DENIED. 4. This case is referred back to the Magistrate Judge for additional proceedings. DONE this the 20th day of September, 2013. /s/ Mark E. Fuller UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?