Radford v. Thomas et al (INMATE 1)
ORDER that the 418 Recommendation is ADOPTED, and it is hereby ORDERED as follows: 1) The Dfts' 45 , 72 , & 89 motions for summary judgment are GRANTED; 2) Judgment is GRANTED in favor of the Dfts; 3) This case is DISMISSED with prejudice; 4) Costs of this proceeding are taxed against the Plf. Signed by Honorable Judge W. Harold Albritton, III on 7/19/2016. (wcl, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA
THOMAS RADFORD, #156846,
KIM TOBIAS THOMAS, et al.,
CASE NO 2:13-cv-188-WHA
This case is before the court on the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (Doc.
#418), entered on March 1, 2016. After requesting and receiving several extensions of time, no
timely objection has been filed to the Recommendation, and after a review of the file, the
Recommendation is ADOPTED, and it is hereby ORDERED as follows:
1. The Defendants’ motions for summary judgment are GRANTED.
2. Judgment is GRANTED in favor of the Defendants.
3. This case is DISMISSED with prejudice.
4. Costs of this proceeding are taxed against the Plaintiff.
DONE this 19th day of July, 2016.
W. Harold Albritton
W. HAROLD ALBRITTON
SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?