Patterson v. Elmore Correctional Facility et al (INMATE 2)

Filing 11

OPINION and ORDER that: 1. The Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge 10 be and is hereby ADOPTED; 2. The 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against the Defendants be and is hereby DISMISSED pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii); and 3. The plaintiff's complaint be and is hereby DISMISSED prior to service of process. An appropriate judgment will be entered. Signed by Honorable Judge Truman M. Hobbs on 9/30/2013. (jg, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA NORTHERN DIVISION JAMES EDWARD PATTERSON, AIS # 168839, Plaintiff, v. ELMORE CORRECTIONAL FACILITY, et al., Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:13cv217-TMH OPINION and ORDER This litigation is now before the court on the recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge entered on July 12, 2013, (doc. # 10), that this case be dismissed with prejudice. After a review of the recommendation, to which no timely objections have been filed, and after an independent review of the entire record, the court believes that the recommendation should be adopted. Accordingly, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED as follows that: 1. The Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge be and is hereby ADOPTED; 2. The 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against the Defendants be and is hereby DISMISSED pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii); and 3. The plaintiff’s complaint be and is hereby DISMISSED prior to service of process. An appropriate judgment will be entered. DONE this 30th day of September, 2013. /s/ Truman M. Hobbs TRUMAN M. HOBBS SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?