Hatcher v. Wynne et al (INMATE 1)

Filing 36

ORDER re 35 Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge filed on April 8, 2016. There being no timely objection to the Recommendation, and after a de novo review of the file, the Recommendation is ADOPTED, and it is hereby ORDERED as follows: 1. The def endants' Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED.2. Judgment is GRANTED in favor of the defendants. 3. This case is DISMISSED with prejudice. 4. Costs are taxed against the plaintiff. 5. Final Judgment will be entered in accordance with this order. Signed by Honorable Judge W. Harold Albritton, III on 5/2/2016. (kh, )

Download PDF
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA NORTHERN DIVISION RONALD LEE HATCHER, #153577, ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Plaintiff, v. WILLIAM WYNNE, et al., Defendants. CASE NO. 2:13-CV-226-WHA (WO) ORDER This cause is before the court on the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge filed on April 8, 2016 (Doc. #35). There being no timely objection to the Recommendation, and after a de novo review of the file, the Recommendation is ADOPTED, and it is hereby ORDERED as follows: 1. The defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED. 2. Judgment is GRANTED in favor of the defendants. 3. This case is DISMISSED with prejudice. 4. Costs are taxed against the plaintiff. 5. Final Judgment will be entered in accordance with this order. DONE this 2nd day of May, 2016. /s/ W. Harold Albritton SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?