Hamilton v. Alabama Department of Corrections et al (INMATE 2)
Filing
36
OPINION and ORDER re 14 Recommendation and 15 Recommendation. It is ORDERED and ADJUDGED that the Recommendations of the Magistrate Judge be and are hereby ADOPTED; that Plaintiff's claims against the the Alabama Department of Corrections b e DISMISSED with prejudice prior to service of process under 28 U.S.C. § 1915 (e)(2)(B)(I) and that the Alabama Department of Corrections be DISMISSED as a party to this cause of action; that Plaintiffs Motion for Preliminary Injunction be DENIED and that the Plaintiffs claims against the remaining defendants be referred back to the Magistrate Judge for additional proceedings. Signed by Honorable Judge Truman M. Hobbs on 9/25/2013. (dmn, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA
NORTHERN DIVISION
DAVID D. HAMILTON, #136399
Plaintiff,
v.
ALABAMA DEPT. OF
CORRECTIONS, et al.,
Defendants.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
CASE NO. 2:13-cv-281-TMH
[wo]
OPINION and ORDER
On June 19, 2013, the Magistrate Judge filed two Recommendations in this case to
which no timely objections have been filed. (Docs. 14 and 15 ). Upon an independent
review of the file in this case and upon consideration of the Recommendation of the
Magistrate Judge, it is
ORDERED and ADJUDGED that the Recommendations of the Magistrate Judge
be and are hereby ADOPTED; that Plaintiff’s claims against the Alabama Department of
Corrections be DISMISSED with prejudice prior to service of process under 28 U.S.C. §
1915 (e)(2)(B)(I) and that the Alabama Department of Corrections be DISMISSED as a
party to this cause of action; that Plaintiff’s Motion for Preliminary Injunction be
DENIED and that the Plaintiff’s claims against the remaining defendants be referred back
to the Magistrate Judge for additional proceedings.
DONE this the 25th day of September, 2013.
/s/ Truman M. Hobbs
TRUMAN M. HOBBS
SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?