Hamilton v. Alabama Department of Corrections et al (INMATE 2)

Filing 36

OPINION and ORDER re 14 Recommendation and 15 Recommendation. It is ORDERED and ADJUDGED that the Recommendations of the Magistrate Judge be and are hereby ADOPTED; that Plaintiff's claims against the the Alabama Department of Corrections b e DISMISSED with prejudice prior to service of process under 28 U.S.C. § 1915 (e)(2)(B)(I) and that the Alabama Department of Corrections be DISMISSED as a party to this cause of action; that Plaintiffs Motion for Preliminary Injunction be DENIED and that the Plaintiffs claims against the remaining defendants be referred back to the Magistrate Judge for additional proceedings. Signed by Honorable Judge Truman M. Hobbs on 9/25/2013. (dmn, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA NORTHERN DIVISION DAVID D. HAMILTON, #136399 Plaintiff, v. ALABAMA DEPT. OF CORRECTIONS, et al., Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CASE NO. 2:13-cv-281-TMH [wo] OPINION and ORDER On June 19, 2013, the Magistrate Judge filed two Recommendations in this case to which no timely objections have been filed. (Docs. 14 and 15 ). Upon an independent review of the file in this case and upon consideration of the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED that the Recommendations of the Magistrate Judge be and are hereby ADOPTED; that Plaintiff’s claims against the Alabama Department of Corrections be DISMISSED with prejudice prior to service of process under 28 U.S.C. § 1915 (e)(2)(B)(I) and that the Alabama Department of Corrections be DISMISSED as a party to this cause of action; that Plaintiff’s Motion for Preliminary Injunction be DENIED and that the Plaintiff’s claims against the remaining defendants be referred back to the Magistrate Judge for additional proceedings. DONE this the 25th day of September, 2013. /s/ Truman M. Hobbs TRUMAN M. HOBBS SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?