Foster v. Dillard et al (INMATE 1)

Filing 57

ORDERED as follows: 1) Plf's 56 objection is OVERRULED; 2) The court ADOPTS the 53 Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge; 3) Plf's 50 & 51 Motions for Preliminary Injunction are DENIED; 4) This case is referred back to the Magistrate Judge for further proceedings. Signed by Honorable Judge W. Harold Albritton, III on 11/9/2015. (wcl, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FORTHE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA NORTHERN DIVISION EDDIE LEE FOSTER, #143404, ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Plaintiff, vs. CYNTHIA DILLARD, et al., Defendants. CASE NO. 2:13-cv-288-WHA (WO) ORDER This case is before the court on the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (Doc. #53) and Plaintiff’s Objection (Doc. #56). The Magistrate Judge recommended that the Plaintiff’s Motions for Preliminary Injunction be denied. Following an independent evaluation and de novo review of the file in this case, the court agrees with the analysis and conclusion of the Magistrate Judge and finds the objection to be without merit. Therefore, it is hereby ORDERED as follows: 1. Plaintiff’s objection is OVERRULED. 2. The court ADOPTS the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge. 3. Plaintiff’s Motions for Preliminary Injunction (Docs. #50 and #51) are DENIED. 4. This case is referred back to the Magistrate Judge for further proceedings. DONE this 9th day of November, 2015. /s/ W. Harold Albritton W. HAROLD ALBRITTON SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?