Wells Fargo Bank, National Association v. ELR, LLC et al
Filing
17
OPINION. Signed by Honorable Judge Myron H. Thompson on 12/2/13. (djy, )
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE
MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, NORTHERN DIVISION
WELLS FARGO BANK,
NATIONAL ASSOCIATION,
successor by merger to
Wachovia Bank, National
Association,
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Plaintiff,
v.
ELR, LLC, et al.,
Defendants.
CIVIL ACTION NO.
2:13cv295-MHT
(WO)
OPINION
Plaintiff
(successor
Wells
by
Fargo
merger
to
Bank,
National
Wachovia
Association
Bank,
National
Association) filed this lawsuit against defendants ELR,
LLC, Robert A. Pike, and Thomas C. Eskridge, asserting
state-law claims relating to the alleged failure to pay
sums due pursuant to a promissory note and a guaranty.
Jurisdiction
(diversity).
is
proper
pursuant
to
28
Only Eskridge has answered.
U.S.C.
§
1332
The cause is
currently before the court on Wells Fargo’s motion for
default judgment against ELR and Pike.
The record in this case reflects that ELR and Pike
were served with copies of the summons and complaint; that
they have failed to respond to the summons and complaint
within the time allowed; and that they have failed to
respond to an order of this court to show cause as to why
final judgment should not be entered against them.
Accordingly, this court is of the opinion that Wells
Fargo’s motion for entry of default judgment should be
granted and that judgment of default as to the amounts due
pursuant to the promissory note and guaranty should be
entered against ELR and Pike as follows:
$ 372,712.13
plus
day
interest
accruing
at
$
43.10
per
between
September 6, 2013, and this date; and $ 14,586.20 as
attorneys’ fees, court costs, and collection expenses.
A judgment will be entered in accordance with this
opinion.
DONE, this the 2nd day of December, 2013.
/s/ Myron H. Thompson
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?