Ezell v. United States of America et al (INMATE 3)

Filing 7

ORDER, JUDGMENT and DECREE of the court that: (1) the petitioner's 6 objection is overruled; (2) the 3 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION of the Magistrate Judge is adopted; (3) the petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2241 is D ISMISSED, as Ezell has not demonstrated his entitlement to proceed under that section and this court lacks jurisdiction to hear his challenge to his conviction and sentence pursuant to28 U.S.C. 2255.. Signed by Honorable Judge Truman M. Hobbs on 10/7/13. (djy, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA NORTHERN DIVISION SAMUEL EZELL, #10061-003, ) ) Petitioner, ) v. ) ) UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, et al., ) ) Respondents. ) CASE NO. 2:13-cv-0302-TMH [WO] ORDER After an independent review of the file, it is the ORDER, JUDGMENT and DECREE of the court that: 1. The petitioner's objection (Doc. #6) filed on June 20, 2013 to the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is overruled; 2. The Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (Doc. #3) filed on May 14, 2013 is adopted; 3. The petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241 is DISMISSED, as Ezell has not demonstrated his entitlement to proceed under that section and this court lacks jurisdiction to hear his challenge to his conviction and sentence pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255. DONE this the 7th day of October, 2013. /s/ Truman M. Hobbs TRUMAN M. HOBBS SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?