Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation v. Harry Brown & Co., LLC, et al

Filing 187

ORDER denying 180 Motion for Attorney-Conducted Voir Dire, as further set out in order. Signed by Honorable Judge W. Harold Albritton, III on 12/15/2015. (wcl, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA NORTHERN DIVISION THE FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION, Plaintiff, v. HARRY BROWN & CO., LLC; STEWARDSHIP INVESTMENTS, LLC; HARRY I. BROWN, JR.; and JOHN M. BROWN, as personal representative of the ESTATE OF HARRY I. BROWN, SR., Defendants. HARRY BROWN & CO., LLC; STEWARDSHIP INVESTMENTS, LLC; HARRY I. BROWN, JR.; and JOHN M. BROWN, as personal representative of the ESTATE OF HARRY I. BROWN, SR., Counterclaimants, v. THE FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION, Counterclaim– Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Civ. Action No. 2:13-cv-350-WHA (WO) ORDER Upon consideration of Defendants’ Motion for Attorney-Conducted Voir Dire (Doc. #180), it is hereby ORDERED that the motion is DENIED. It is this court’s practice to conduct voir dire, with consideration given to requested voir dire questions submitted by counsel as set out in the scheduling order. If any counsel wishes to ask follow-up questions to a response given by a member of the venire, the court allows counsel to ask follow-up questions directly to the responding member. Juror information forms will be available to counsel in advance of trial. DONE this 15th day of December, 2015. /s/ W. Harold Albritton W. HAROLD ALBRITTON SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?