Godwin v. Bentley et al (INMATE 1)

Filing 15

ORDER: 1. The Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge 14 is ADOPTED; 2. The case is DISMISSED without prejudice on Plaintiff's motion, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(i); 3. In light of Plaintiff's motion and this order, it is ORDERED that Plaintiff's Motion to Certify Class is DENIED as moot. A separate judgment shall issue. Signed by Chief Judge William Keith Watkins on 8/26/2013. (jg, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA NORTHERN DIVISION DANNY GODWIN, # 208488, Plaintiff, v. ROBERT BENTLEY, et al., Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CASE NO. 2:13-CV-407-WKW ORDER On August 5, 2013, the Magistrate Judge filed a Report and Recommendation (Doc. # 14) regarding Plaintiff’s 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint and Plaintiff’s motion to dismiss his claim (Doc. # 12), filed before service of the complaint. No timely objections have been filed. Based upon an independent review of the file in this case and upon consideration of the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, it is ORDERED as follows: 1. The Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (Doc. # 14) is ADOPTED; 2. The case is DISMISSED without prejudice on Plaintiff’s motion, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(i); 3. In light of Plaintiff’s motion and this order, it is ORDERED that Plaintiff’s Motion to Certify Class is DENIED as moot. A separate judgment shall issue. DONE this 26th day of August, 2013. /s/ W. Keith Watkins CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?