Hastings v. Drake (INMATE 1)

Filing 96

ORDERED as follows: 1. The 95 Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is ADOPTED. 2. The defendant's motion for judgment as a matter of law is GRANTED and Judgment is GRANTED in favor of defendant Kenneth Drake. 3. This case is DISMISSED with prejudice. 4. Costs are taxed against the plaintiff. 5. Final Judgment will be entered in accordance with this order. Signed by Honorable Judge W. Harold Albritton, III on 9/13/2016. (kh, )

Download PDF
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA NORTHERN DIVISION RAYMOND D. HASTINGS, #135351, Plaintiff, v. KENNETH DRAKE, Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CASE NO. 2:13-CV-418-WHA (WO) ORDER This cause is before the court on the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge filed on August 24, 2016 (Doc. #95). There being no timely objection to the Recommendation, and after an independent review of the file, it is hereby ORDERED as follows: 1. The Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is ADOPTED. 2. The defendant’s motion for judgment as a matter of law is GRANTED and Judgment is GRANTED in favor of defendant Kenneth Drake. 3. This case is DISMISSED with prejudice. 4. Costs are taxed against the plaintiff. 5. Final Judgment will be entered in accordance with this order. DONE this 13th day of September, 2016. /s/ W. Harold Albritton SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?