Thomas v. Ellington et al (INMATE 3)

Filing 14

ORDER ADOPTING 13 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION of the Magistrate Judge; ORDERING that this case is DISMISSED because petitioner has failed to demonstrate that the disciplinary action gives rise to any claim for federal habeas relief and has stated no claim for denial of her constitutional right to due process. Signed by Honorable Judge W. Harold Albritton, III on 6/15/15. (djy, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA NORTHERN DIVISION ELIZABETH L. THOMAS, #207981, Petitioner, vs. EDWARD ELLINGTON, Warden, et al., Respondents. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CASE NO. 2:13-cv-425-WHA (WO) ORDER This case is before the court on the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (Doc. #13), entered on May 11, 2015. There being no timely objection filed to the Recommendation, and after a review of the file, the Recommendation is ADOPTED, and it is hereby ORDERED that this case is DISMISSED because Petitioner has failed to demonstrate that the disciplinary action gives rise to any claim for federal habeas relief and has stated no claim for denial of her constitutional right to due process. Final Judgment will be entered accordingly. DONE this 15th day of June, 2015. /s/ W. Harold Albritton W. HAROLD ALBRITTON SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?