Morrow v. Whaley Construction Company, Inc. (CONSENT)

Filing 19

OPINION AND ORDER ordering and adjudging as follows that: (1) the 17 joint motion to approve settlement be and is hereby GRANTED and the settlement be and is hereby APPROVED; (2) The court will enter a Stipulated Judgment in accordance with the Settlement Agreement; (3) this case be and is hereby DISMISSED with prejudice, each party to bear its own costs. Signed by Honorable Judge Charles S. Coody on 6/19/14. (djy, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA NORTHERN DIVISION JASON SCOTT MORROW, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ) WHALEY CONSTRUCTION CO., INC., ) ) Defendant. ) CIVIL ACT. NO. 2:13cv429-CSC OPINION and ORDER On June 19, 2014, this court held a hearing on the parties’ joint motion to approve contingent settlement (doc. # 17) filed on May 27, 2014. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c)(1) and M.D. Ala. LR 73.1, the parties have consented to a United States Magistrate Judge conducting all proceedings in this case and ordering the entry of final judgment. At the hearing, the court reviewed the motion, and settlement agreement and received additional information from the parties. The court finds that the compromise settlement is a fair and reasonable resolution of a bona fide dispute over Fair Labor Standard Act provisions. Accordingly, based on the parties’ consent and after consideration of the motion, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED as follows that: 1. The joint motion to approve settlement (doc. # 17) be and is hereby GRANTED and the settlement be and is hereby APPROVED; 2. Agreement. The court will enter a Stipulated Judgment in accordance with the Settlement 3. This case be and is hereby DISMISSED with prejudice, each party to bear its own costs. Done this 19th day of June, 2014. /s/Charles S. Coody CHARLES S. COODY UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?