Lindsey v. Montgomery County Commission et al (INMATE 2)

Filing 8

ORDER ADOPTING 6 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION; ORDERING as follows: (1) plaintiff's claims against the Montgomery County Commission are DISMISSED with prejudice prior to service of process pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2)(B)(i ) and (iii); (2) the Montgomery County Commission is DISMISSED as a defendant to this action; (3) with respect to plaintiff's claims against the remaining defendants, the case is referred back to the Magistrate Judge for appropriate proceedings. Signed by Honorable Judge W. Harold Albritton, III on 8/20/13. (Attachments: # 1 civil appeals checklist)(djy, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA NORTHERN DIVISION ANDERT ALLEN LINDSEY, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ) MONTGOMERY COUNTY COMMISSION,) et al., ) ) Defendants. ) CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:13cv485-WHA ORDER No timely objection having been filed to the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (Doc. #6), entered on July 29, 2013, the Recommendation is ADOPTED, and it is hereby ORDERED as follows: 1. Plaintiff’s claims against the Montgomery County Commission are DISMISSED with prejudice prior to service of process pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(i) and (iii). 2. The Montgomery County Commission is DISMISSED as a Defendant to this action. 3. With respect to Plaintiff’s claims against the remaining Defendants, the case is referred back to the Magistrate Judge for appropriate proceedings. DONE this 20th day of August, 2013. /s/ W. Harold Albritton W. HAROLD ALBRITTON SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?