Williams v. Phelps et al (INMATE 1)
ORDER that the 23 Recommendation is ADOPTED, and it is hereby ORDERED as follows: 1) The dft's 9 Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED; 2) Judgment is GRANTED in favor of the dft; 3) This case is DISMISSED with prejudice; 4) Costs are taxed against the plf; 5) Final Judgment will be entered in accordance with this order. Signed by Honorable Judge W. Harold Albritton, III on 5/11/2016. (wcl, )
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES
FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA
WALTER EARL WILLIAMS, #131113,
CASE NO. 2:13-CV-512-WHA
This cause is before the court on the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge filed on
April 20, 2016 (Doc. #23). There being no timely objection to the Recommendation, and after a
de novo review of the file, the Recommendation is ADOPTED, and it is hereby ORDERED as
1. The defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED.
2. Judgment is GRANTED in favor of the defendant.
3. This case is DISMISSED with prejudice.
4. Costs are taxed against the plaintiff.
5. Final Judgment will be entered in accordance with this order.
DONE this 11th day of May, 2016.
W. Harold Albritton
SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?