Owens v. Thompson et al (MAG+)
Filing
41
JUDGMENT, in accordance with the memorandum opinion entered this date, it is the ORDER, JUDGMENT, and DECREE of the court as follows: (1) plaintiff's 34 , 35 , & 36 objections are OVERRULED; (2) the US Magistrate Judge's 33 Report a nd Recommendation is adopted; (3) defendants' granting 20 Motion to Dismiss is granted; (4) Defendants' alternative 20 Motion for More Definite Statement is denied as moot; (5) this lawsuit is dismissed in its entirety; further ORDE RING that costs are taxed against plaintiff, for execution may issue; directing the clerk to enter this document on the civil docket as a final judgment pursuant to Rule 58 FRCP; this case is closed. Signed by Honorable Judge Myron H. Thompson on 12/6/13. (Attachments: # 1 civil appeals checklist)(djy, )
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE
MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, NORTHERN DIVISION
JAMES OWENS,
Plaintiff,
v.
BARBARA THOMPSON, et al.,
Defendants.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
CIVIL ACTION NO.
2:13cv526-MHT
(WO)
JUDGMENT
In accordance with the memorandum opinion entered
this date, it is the ORDER, JUDGMENT, and DECREE of the
court as follows:
(1) Plaintiff's objections (Doc. Nos. 34, 35, & 36)
are overruled.
(2) The
United
States
Magistrate
Judge's
recommendation (Doc. No. 33) is adopted.
(3) Defendants' motion to dismiss (Doc. No. 20) is
granted.
(4) Defendants’ alternative motion for more definite
statement (doc. No. 20) is denied as moot.
(5) This lawsuit is dismissed in its entirety.
It
is
further
ORDERED
that
costs
are
taxed
against plaintiff, for which execution may issue.
The clerk of the court is DIRECTED to enter this
document on the civil docket as a final judgment pursuant
to Rule 58 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.
This case is closed.
DONE, this the 6th day of December, 2013.
/s/ Myron H. Thompson
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?