Marks v. Keeton, et al (INMATE 2)(LEAD)

Filing 9

ORDER directing that the court ADOPTS the Recommendation (Doc. # 4 ) and the Supplemental Recommendation (Doc. # 6 ), and it is hereby ORDERED that these consolidated cases are both DISMISSED with prejudice pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(i) and (ii). Signed by Honorable Judge W. Harold Albritton, III on 11/5/13. (scn, )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA
NORTHERN DIVISION

JULIUS MARKS #191 094,
Plaintiff,
v.
COI M. KEETON, et al.,
Defendants.

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:13cv620-WHA

______________________________________
JULIUS MARKS #191 094,
Plaintiff,
v.
LT. P. WOODS, et al.,
Defendants.

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:13cv647-WHA

ORDER
These consolidated cases are before the court on the Recommendation of the Magistrate
Judge (Doc. #4) and the Supplemental Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (Doc. #6),
together with the Plaintiff’s Objections to the Supplemental Recommendation (Doc. #7). The
court has conducted an independent evaluation and de novo review of this case, after which the
court finds as follows:
No timely objection was filed to the original Recommendation. For the reasons stated by
the Magistrate Judge in both that Recommendation and the Supplemental Recommendation, the
court finds the Plaintiff’s objections to be without merit, and they are hereby OVERRULED.

The court ADOPTS the Recommendation (Doc. #4) and the Supplemental Recommendation
(Doc. #6), and it is hereby
ORDERED that these consolidated cases are both DISMISSED with prejudice pursuant
to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(i) and (ii).
DONE this 5th day of November, 2013.

/s/ W. Harold Albritton
W. HAROLD ALBRITTON
SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE