Isaacs v. Felder Services, LLC et al

Filing 46

FINAL JUDGMENT: it is the ORDER, JUDGMENT, and DECREE of the court as follows: (1) The US Magistrate Judge's 41 recommendation is adopted for the reasons set out in the opinion; (2) Dft Felder Services, LLC's 27 motion for summary judgm ent is granted; (3) Judgment is entered in favor of dft Felder Services, LLC and against plf Roger Isaacs, with plf Isaacs taking nothing by his complaint; further ORDERED that costs are taxed against plf Isaacs, for which execution may issue; DIRECT ING the clerk to enter this document on the civil docket as a final judgment pursuant to Rule 58 FRCP; This case is closed. Signed by Honorable Judge Myron H. Thompson on 10/29/2015. (furn: calendar, ag, wr) (term: PTC for 10/23/2015; Jury Trial for 11/30/2015) (Attachments: # 1 Civil Appeals Checklist) (wcl, )

Download PDF
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, NORTHERN DIVISION ROGER ISAACS, ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Plaintiff, v. FELDER SERVICES, LLC, Defendant. CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:13cv693-MHT (WO) JUDGMENT In accordance with the memorandum opinion entered today, it is the ORDER, JUDGMENT, and DECREE of the court as follows: (1) The United States Magistrate Judge's recommendation (doc. no. 41) is adopted for the reasons set out in the opinion. (2) Defendant Felder Services, LLC’s motion for summary judgment (doc. no. 27) is granted. (3) Felder Judgment Services, is entered LLC Isaacs, with plaintiff complaint. and in favor against of defendant plaintiff Roger Isaacs taking nothing by his It is further ORDERED that costs are taxed against plaintiff Isaacs, for which execution may issue. The clerk of the court is DIRECTED to enter this document on the civil pursuant to Rule 58 of docket the as a Federal final Rules judgment of Civil Procedure. This case is closed. DONE, this the 29th day of October, 2015. /s/ Myron H. Thompson UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?