McClain v. Jones et al (INMATE 3)
ORDER ADOPTING 17 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION of the Magistrate Judge; ORDERING that the petition for writ of habeas corpus under 28 USC 2254 is DENIED and this case is DISMISSED with prejudice. Signed by Honorable Judge W. Harold Albritton, III on 4/20/16. (djy, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA
ANTHONY McCLAIN, #276132,
CLARA JONES, et al.,
CASE NO 2:13-cv-723-WHA
This case is before the court on the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (Doc. #17),
entered on March 23, 2016, and the Petitioner’s “Motion to Dismiss Without Prejudice” (Doc.
#18), which the court interprets as a limited objection to the Recommendation. The court has
conducted an independent evaluation and de novo review of the matter.
The Magistrate Judge recommends that this habeas corpus petition be denied and the case
dismissed with prejudice. The Petitioner agrees with the Magistrate Judge’s conclusion that his
claims are procedurally defaulted and requests that the court “adhere to the Magistrate Judge’s
denial of this case . . . .” He then requests that the case be dismissed without prejudice. The
court agrees, however, with the Magistrate Judge that the dismissal should be with prejudice.
Therefore, to the extent that the Petitioner’s motion is considered as an objection, the motion and
objection are OVERRULED.
The court ADOPTS the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, and it is hereby
ORDERED that the petition for writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. 2254 is DENIED,
and this case is DISMISSED with prejudice.
DONE this 20th day of April, 2016.
/s/ W. Harold Albritton
W. HAROLD ALBRITTON
SENIOR U. S. DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?