Ross v. Sconyers, et al. (INMATE 1)

Filing 22

ORDERED that (1) The 21 Recommendation is ADOPTED; (2) Dft's 8 Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED as to all federal constitutional claims; (3) The pendant state-law claim for lack of an investigation is DISMISSED without prejudice; and (4) Costs are taxed against Plf. Signed by Chief Judge William Keith Watkins on 7/13/2016. (wcl, )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA
NORTHERN DIVISION
TRAVIS DORREL ROSS,
# 199066,

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

Plaintiff,
v.
KENNETH SCONYERS, et al.,
Defendants.

CASE NO. 2:13-CV-764-WKW
[WO]

ORDER
On June 16, 2016, the Magistrate Judge filed a Recommendation to which no
timely objections have been filed. (Doc. # 21.) Upon an independent review of the
file and upon consideration of the Recommendation, it is ORDERED that
(1)

The Recommendation is ADOPTED;

(2)

Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. # 8) is GRANTED

as to all federal constitutional claims;
(3)

The pendant state-law claim for lack of an investigation is DISMISSED

without prejudice; and
(4)

Costs are taxed against Plaintiff.

A separate final judgment will be entered.
DONE this 13th day of July, 2016.
/s/ W. Keith Watkins
CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE