Rutledge v. Strange (INMATE 3)

Filing 25

JUDGMENT, in accordance with the memorandum opinion entered this date, it is the ORDER, JUDGMENT and DECREE of the court that: (1) petitioner's 22 objections are overruled; (2) the 14 report and recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is adop ted; (3) the 1 petition for writ of habeas corpus is denied because the required permission has not been obtained from the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals; further ORDERING that costs are taxed against petitioner, for which execution may issue; directing the clerk to enter this document on the civil docket as a final judgment pursuant to Rule 58 FRCP; this case is closed. Signed by Honorable Judge Myron H. Thompson on 8/28/14. (Attachments: # 1 civil appeals checklist)(djy, )

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE
MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, NORTHERN DIVISION

JONATHAN LOUIS RUTLEDGE,

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

Petitioner,
v.
LUTHER STRANGE,
Respondent.

CIVIL ACTION NO.
2:13cv785-TMH
(WO)

JUDGMENT
In accordance with the memorandum opinion entered
this date, it is the ORDER, JUDGMENT, and DECREE of the
court that:
(1) Petitioner’s

objections

(Doc.

No.

22)

are

overruled.
(2) The

United

States

Magistrate

Judge's

recommendation (Doc. No. 13) is adopted.
(3) The petition for writ of habeas corpus (Doc. No.
1) is denied because the required permission has
not

been

obtained

Court of Appeals.

from

the

Eleventh

Circuit

It is further ORDERED that costs are taxed against
petitioner, for which execution may issue.
The clerk of the court is DIRECTED to enter this
document on the civil docket as a final judgment pursuant
to Rule 58 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.
This case is closed.
DONE, this the 28th day of August, 2014.

/s/ Myron H. Thompson
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE