Carey v. Jones, et al. (INMATE 2)
Filing
33
OPINION and ORDER ADOPTING 32 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION of the Magistrate Judge, and this case be and is hereby DISMISSED as follows: (1) defs' 18 Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED; (2) plf's complaint against def Mail Room Supervisor is DISMISSED with prejudice under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(i); (3) this case is DISMISSED with prejudice; (4) costs are taxed against plf. Signed by Honorable Judge W. Harold Albritton, III on 2/10/17. (djy, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA
NORTHERN DIVISION
CARLOS CAREY, #245 045,
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Plaintiff,
v.
WARDEN JONES, et al.,
Defendants.
CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:13-CV-799-WHA
[WO]
OPINION and ORDER
On January 18, 2017, the Magistrate Judge filed a Recommendation to which no timely
objections have been filed. Doc. 32.
Upon an independent review of the file and upon
consideration of the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, it is
ORDERED and ADJUDGED that the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge be and is
hereby ADOPTED, and this case be and is hereby DISMISSED as follows:
1. Defendants’ motion for summary judgment (Doc. 18) is GRANTED;
2. Plaintiff’s complaint against Defendant Mail Room Supervisor is DISMISSED with
prejudice under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(i);
3. This case is DISMISSED prejudice;
4. Costs are taxed against Plaintiff.
Final Judgment will be entered accordingly.
Done, this 10th day of February, 2017.
/s/ W. Harold Albritton
SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?