Scarver v. Hetzel et al (INMATE 3)

Filing 11

ORDER directing as follows: (1) petitioner's 10 objections are overruled; (2) 9 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION of the Magistrate Judge is adopted; (3) this petition for habes corpus relief is DENIED and this case is DISMISSED pursuant to 28 USC 2244(d); (4) costs are taxed against the petitioner. Signed by Honorable Judge W. Harold Albritton, III on 6/6/14. (djy, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA NORTHERN DIVISION CURTIS EARL SCARVER, Petitioner, v. GARY HETZEL, et al., Respondents. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:13-cv-825-WHA ORDER This case is before the court on the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (Doc. # 9), entered on March 17, 2014, and the Petitioner’s Objections (Doc. # 10), filed on March 28, 2014. After an independent evaluation and de novo review of the file in this case the court finds the objections to be without merit. Petitioner merely reargues the issues of equitable tolling and actual innocence as he did before the Magistrate Judge. The court agrees with the well-reasoned findings of the Magistrate Judge in those regards, and it is hereby ORDERED as follows: 1. Petitioner’s objections are overruled. 2. The court adopts the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (Doc. # 9). 3. This petition for habeas corpus relief is DENIED, and this case is DISMISSED pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2244(d). 4. Costs are taxed against the Petitioner. DONE this 6th day of June, 2014. /s/ W. Harold Albritton W. HAROLD ALBRITTON SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?