Stewart v. The City of Montgomery, et al.

Filing 36

JUDGMENT In accordance with the memorandum opinion enteredtoday, it is the ORDER, JUDGMENT, and DECREE of thecourt as follows: (1) plf's 34 Objections are overruled; (2) the 33 Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is adopted; (3) defs' 27 Motion for Summary Judgment is granted; (4) judgment is entered in favor of defs and against plf, with plf taking nothing by his complaint; further ORDERING that costs are taxed against plf, for which execution may issue; directing the clerk to enter this document on the civil docket as a final judgment pursuant to Rule 58 FRCP; this case is closed. Signed by Honorable Judge Myron H. Thompson on 3/30/16. (Attachments: # 1 civil appeals checklist)(djy, )

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE
MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, NORTHERN DIVISION
LUTHER PAUL STEWART,
Plaintiff,
v.
CITY OF MONTGOMERY, etc.,
et al.,
Defendants.

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

CIVIL ACTION NO.
2:13cv859-MHT
(WO)

JUDGMENT
In accordance with the memorandum opinion entered
today, it is the ORDER, JUDGMENT, and DECREE of the
court as follows:
(1) Plaintiff's

objections

(doc.

no.

34)

are

overruled.
(2) The

United

States

Magistrate

Judge's

recommendation (doc. no. 33) is adopted.
(3) Defendants’ motion for summary judgment (doc.
no. 27) is granted.
(4) Judgment is entered in favor of defendants and
against plaintiff, with plaintiff taking nothing by his
complaint.

It is further ORDERED that costs are taxed against
plaintiff, for which execution may issue.
The clerk of the court is DIRECTED to enter this
document

on

the

civil

pursuant

to

Rule

58

of

docket
the

as

a

Federal

final
Rules

judgment
of

Civil

Procedure.
This case is closed.
DONE, this the 30th day of March, 2016.
/s/ Myron H. Thompson
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE