Cooley v. Price et al (INMATE 3)

Filing 10

ORDER directing as follows: (1) petitioner's 9 General Objection to Report and Recommendation of the Mag Judge is OVERRULED to the extent that petitioner actually objects to a transfer of this action to the USDC for the Southern District of Alabama; (2) ADOPTING 8 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION; (3) this action is TRANSFERRED to the USDC for the Southern District of Alabama pursuant to 28 USC 1631. Signed by Chief Judge William Keith Watkins on 3/6/14. (djy, )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA
NORTHERN DIVISION
CHARLES EDWARD COOLEY, JR.,
Petitioner,
v.
CHERYL PRICE, et al.,
Respondents.

)
)
)
) CASE NO. 2:13-CV-0875-TMH
)
[WO]
)
)
)

ORDER
Before the court are the Magistrate Judge’s Recommendation (Doc. # 8) and
Petitioner Charles Edward Cooley, Jr.’s General Objection (Doc. # 9). Upon an
independent and de novo review of the Recommendation, 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), it is
ORDERED as follows:
1.

Petitioner’s General Objection (Doc. # 9) to the Recommendation of the

Magistrate Judge (Doc. # 8) is OVERRULED to the extent that Petitioner actually
objects to a transfer of this action to the United States District Court for the Southern
District of Alabama1;
2.

1

The Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (Doc. # 8) is ADOPTED;

Although Petitioner styled his filing as a General Objection, he asserts therein that “he
is satisfied with the Recommendation of the honorable Magistrate Judge . . . .” (Doc. # 9.)

3.

This action is TRANSFERRED to the United States District Court for the

Southern District of Alabama pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1631.
DONE this 6th day of March, 2014.
/s/ W. Keith Watkins
CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

2