Cooley v. Price et al (INMATE 3)
ORDER directing as follows: (1) petitioner's 9 General Objection to Report and Recommendation of the Mag Judge is OVERRULED to the extent that petitioner actually objects to a transfer of this action to the USDC for the Southern District of Alabama; (2) ADOPTING 8 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION; (3) this action is TRANSFERRED to the USDC for the Southern District of Alabama pursuant to 28 USC 1631. Signed by Chief Judge William Keith Watkins on 3/6/14. (djy, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA
CHARLES EDWARD COOLEY, JR.,
CHERYL PRICE, et al.,
) CASE NO. 2:13-CV-0875-TMH
Before the court are the Magistrate Judge’s Recommendation (Doc. # 8) and
Petitioner Charles Edward Cooley, Jr.’s General Objection (Doc. # 9). Upon an
independent and de novo review of the Recommendation, 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), it is
ORDERED as follows:
Petitioner’s General Objection (Doc. # 9) to the Recommendation of the
Magistrate Judge (Doc. # 8) is OVERRULED to the extent that Petitioner actually
objects to a transfer of this action to the United States District Court for the Southern
District of Alabama1;
The Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (Doc. # 8) is ADOPTED;
Although Petitioner styled his filing as a General Objection, he asserts therein that “he
is satisfied with the Recommendation of the honorable Magistrate Judge . . . .” (Doc. # 9.)
This action is TRANSFERRED to the United States District Court for the
Southern District of Alabama pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1631.
DONE this 6th day of March, 2014.
/s/ W. Keith Watkins
CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?