Carey v. Jones, et al. (INMATE 1)
Filing
34
ORDER directing that, after a review of the 29 Recommendation, and after an independent review of the entire record, the court finds that the Recommendation should be adopted; accordingly, it is ORDERED that the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is hereby ADOPTED; the motion for preliminary injunction filed by Plaintiff is DENIED; and this case is referred back to the Magistrate Judge for additional proceedings. Signed by Honorable Judge W. Harold Albritton, III on 4/23/14. (scn, )
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES
FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA
NORTHERN DIVISION
CARLOS CAREY, #245045,
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Plaintiff,
v.
WARDEN JONES, et al.,
Defendants.
CASE NO. 2:13-CV-884-TMH
[WO]
ORDER
The Magistrate Judge entered a Recommendation (Doc. 29) in this case to which
no timely objections have been filed. After a review of the Recommendation, and after
an independent review of the entire record, the court finds that the Recommendation
should be adopted. Accordingly, it is
ORDERED that the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is hereby
ADOPTED; the motion for preliminary injunction filed by Plaintiff is DENIED; and this
case is referred back to the Magistrate Judge for additional proceedings.
Done this 23rd day of April, 2014.
/s/ W. Harold Albritton
SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?