Parten v. Alabama Department of Tourism, et al.
Filing
65
JUDGMENT directing that, in accordance with the opinion entered this date, it is the ORDER, JUDGMENT, and DECREE of the court as follows: (1) Defendants Alabama Department of Tourism and Lee Sentells motion for summary judgment (doc. no. 23 ) is gra nted as to all of plaintiff Edith M. Partens federal claims; (2) Summary judgment is entered in favor of defendants Alabama Department of Tourism and Lee Sentell and against plaintiff Parten on all of plaintiff Partens federal claims, with plaintiff Parten taking nothing as to said claims; the clerk of the court is DIRECTED to enter this document on the civil docket as a final judgment pursuant to Rule 58 of the Federal Rules Civil Procedure; this case is not closed. Signed by Honorable Judge Myron H. Thompson on April 20, 2015. (scn, )
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE
MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, NORTHERN DIVISION
EDITH M. PARTEN,
Plaintiff,
v.
ALABAMA DEPARTMENT OF
TOURISM, a governmental
entity; and LEE SENTELL,
in his official and
individual capacities,
Defendants.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
CIVIL ACTION NO.
2:13cv944-MHT
(WO)
JUDGMENT
In accordance with the opinion entered this date,
it is the ORDER, JUDGMENT, and DECREE of the court as
follows:
(1) Defendants Alabama Department of Tourism and
Lee Sentell’s motion for summary judgment (doc.
no. 23) is granted as to all of plaintiff Edith
M. Parten’s federal claims.
(2) Summary
judgment
is
entered
in
favor
of
defendants Alabama Department of Tourism and
Lee Sentell and against plaintiff Parten on all
of
plaintiff
plaintiff
Parten’s
Parten
taking
federal
claims,
nothing
as
to
with
said
claims.
The clerk of the court is DIRECTED to enter this
document
on
pursuant
to
the
Rule
civil
58
docket
of
the
as
a
final
Federal
judgment
Rules
Civil
Procedure.
This case is not closed.
Plaintiff Parten’s state
claims remain pending.
DONE, this the 20th day of April, 2015.
/s/ Myron H. Thompson____
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?